How Can We Improve UK Drug and Alcohol Policy? (by lsewebsite)
The poster child for strong patent protection is usually the pharmaceutical industry, as drugs are easily copied and can cost upwards of a billion dollars to develop. Here, Boldrin and Levine admit that the government would likely need to step in. But rather than giving companies a legal monopoly over their formulas, the authors suggest we should modify the drug approval process to let makers start recouping their costs faster. They would also set up a prize system to reward companies that invent the new medicines we need.The Case for Abolishing Patents (Yes, All of Them) - Business - The Atlantic
srqm:
(via Drugs that cause most harm: Scoring drugs | The Economist — a reprise of the Nutt et al. graph that relates to this BBC Radio 4 item; oh, and I would like to see the number of users plotted on a third dimension, possibly bar height)
Do not be surprised: the National Academy of Medicine advocates the opposite viewpoint.
Elizabeth Pisani uses unconventional field research to understand how real-world behaviors influence AIDS transmission — and to overhaul antiquated, ineffective prevention strategies.Elizabeth Pisani: Sex, drugs and HIV — let’s get rational | Video on TED.com